Article 370 listening to | ‘Centre has no intention to the touch particular provisions relevant to Northeast’

Several petitions challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which split the erstwhile State into two Union Territories were referred to a Constitution Bench in 2019. File

A number of petitions difficult the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which break up the erstwhile State into two Union Territories had been referred to a Structure Bench in 2019. File
| Picture Credit score: Sushil Kumar Verma

As a five-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud continued its listening to on a number of petitions difficult the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370, Solicitor Common Tushar Mehta on August 23 submitted on particular directions of the Union that the “Union Authorities has no intention to have an effect on any of the particular provisions relevant to Northeast or any a part of India”.

Observe SC listening to on Article 370 abrogation stay updates right here

CJI Chandrachud disposed of the IA by recording.

“The reference of this case is confined to Article 370. There isn’t a commonality of curiosity within the Interlocutory Utility (IA) and the case being heard. In any occasion, the Solicitor Common’s assertion on behad of the Union allays any apprehension on this regard. Thus, the IA stands disposed off.”

Leave a Comment